<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.3.260 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [注大乘入楞伽經](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791) › 3.260

# 注大乘入楞伽經 3.260

注大乘入楞伽經 3.260

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [3.260](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.3.260)

此難如來，若說有如來藏義，是違上一切修多羅皆應說空，即同外道說有神我。然彼計我其義有三：一者、體常名為作者；二者、雖在五陰而離於求那；三者、遍歷諸趣實非生滅。今說藏義，豈非同於外道我耶？

> This challenges the Tathāgata: if he teaches the meaning of the tathāgatagarbha, this contradicts the statement above that all sūtras should teach emptiness, and becomes identical with non-Buddhists asserting an ātman. Now, their conception of the self has three meanings: first, its substance is eternal, called the agent; second, although within the five aggregates, it is free from the guṇas; third, it universally traverses all realms of existence, truly without arising or ceasing. Now teaching the meaning of the garbha, is this not identical with the non-Buddhist self?  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 3.259](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.3.259)
- [Next: 3.261](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.3.261)
- [Up: 3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.3)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791~en-mt.3.260) — English, machine translation

## Linked texts (1)

- [Mdo kun las btus pa](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.tibet.tengyur.dbu_ma.sutrasamuccaya*bo.112) — Classical Tibetan

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.3.260](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.3.260) · Pramāṇa
