[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [注大乘入楞伽經](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791) › 5.30 # 注大乘入楞伽經 5.30 注大乘入楞伽經 5.30 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [5.30](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.5.30) 《唯識論》言「貪、瞋、癡、慢、疑、身見、邊見、邪見、見取、戒禁取，如是總別十煩惱中，六通俱生及分別起，任運思察俱得生故。疑及邪見二取四種，唯分別起。要由惡友及邪教力，自審思察方得生故。」經言身見有二種，謂俱生及分別。譬依緣起自性，種種妄計執著性生。如依俱生有分別起，謂依五陰起妄想身見，以彼妄想不實故，非有無法，愚夫橫執。如陽焰中無水，鹿渴所逼故，妄作水想。此分別身見，由無智慧故，執我我所久遠相應。須陀洹觀雖有五陰合成此人，中無有我也。令審觀故見人無我，即時捨離，斷分別身見。 > The Vijñaptimātratāsiddhi says: "Among the ten defilements in general and particular—craving, anger, ignorance, conceit, doubt, identity view, extreme view, wrong view, view-attachment, and attachment to rules and rituals—six apply to both the innate and the conceptually arisen, because both can arise through spontaneous reflection. Doubt, wrong view, and the two attachments—these four—are purely conceptually arisen; they only arise by relying on the influence of evil companions and perverted doctrines, through one's own deliberative examination." The sūtra states that identity view is of two kinds: innate and conceptually arisen. It is just as, relying on the nature of dependent origination, the various natures of imagined attachment arise. Just as relying on the innate there is the conceptually arisen, relying on the five aggregates one gives rise to the conceptualized identity view; because that conceptualization is unreal, being neither an existing nor a non-existing phenomenon, fools arbitrarily grasp at it. It is like there being no water in a mirage, yet deer pressed by thirst falsely form the conception of water. This conceptually arisen identity view, due to the absence of wisdom, grasps at self and what belongs to self in long-standing association. The srotāpanna contemplates that although there are the five aggregates combined to form this person, therein there is no self. Causing careful contemplation, they see the selflessness of persons and immediately abandon it, severing the conceptually arisen identity view. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 5.29](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.5.29) - [Next: 5.31](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.5.31) - [Up: 5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.5) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791~en-mt.5.30) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.5.30](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.5.30) · Pramāṇa