[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [注大乘入楞伽經](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791) › 6.234 # 注大乘入楞伽經 6.234 注大乘入楞伽經 6.234 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [6.234](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.6.234) 四假五分成墮有無破。又彼立不生宗，要假因喻合結五分而成，故不應立。又彼不生宗，於有無法上立皆不即，此宗即入一切法數中也。有無性相本亦不生故，何處得立不生宗也？ > Fourth is the refutation that it relies on five members and falls into existence and non-existence. Furthermore, establishing that thesis of non-arising requires relying on the five members—reason, example, application, and conclusion—to be formed, so it should not be established. Moreover, that thesis of non-arising does not apply when established on existent or non-existent phenomena, and this thesis itself falls into the category of all phenomena. Since the nature and marks of existence and non-existence are originally also unborn, where could one establish the thesis of non-arising? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 6.233](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.6.233) - [Next: 6.235](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.6.235) - [Up: 6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.6) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791~en-mt.6.234) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.6.234](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.6.234) · Pramāṇa