<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.7.149 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [注大乘入楞伽經](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791) › 7.149

# 注大乘入楞伽經 7.149

注大乘入楞伽經 7.149

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [7.149](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.7.149)

大慧因上言如來法身無有生滅，又如佛昔修多羅中，分別攝取不生不滅，說此即是如來異名。然不生不滅，此則無法，云何說為如來異名？故大慧舉此二教相違，以請如來會通。為是無性？為是如來異名？

> Because it was stated above that the Tathāgata's Dharmakāya has neither arising nor cessation, and also as the Buddha formerly in the sūtras conceptually identified non-arising and non-cessation, stating that this is an alternate name for the Tathāgata; yet since non-arising and non-cessation means there is no dharma, why is it said to be an alternate name for the Tathāgata? Mahāmati therefore brought up the contradiction between these two teachings to request that the Tathāgata harmonize them: Is it non-nature? Or is it an alternate name for the Tathāgata?  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 7.148](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.7.148)
- [Next: 7.150](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.7.150)
- [Up: 7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.7)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791~en-mt.7.149) — English, machine translation

## Linked texts (1)

- [大乘入楞伽經](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.mahayanasutra.lankavatara*zh-siksananda.5.10) — Classical Chinese

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.7.149](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.7.149) · Pramāṇa
