[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [注大乘入楞伽經](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791) › 7.30 # 注大乘入楞伽經 7.30 注大乘入楞伽經 7.30 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [7.30](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.7.30) 佛說一切法，因於無始戲論業執諸惡習氣而生三有，愚夫不覺唯是自心妄想所見，執取外法，及外道說我及根境和合知生。佛非如是，謂知一切法悉虛妄故，不得說有因無因，唯依妄念能所分別，假施緣起，本無實體，非執我者所能覺知。又涅槃等亦但數有三，況說作與非作耶？ > The Buddha teaches that all phenomena arise in the three realms of existence because of the bad habit-energies of beginningless conceptual proliferation and karmic grasping. Foolish people do not realize that these are merely what is seen by the parikalpa of their own minds; they grasp at external phenomena, or as the heterodox say, that consciousness arises from the combination of an ātman, sense faculties, and objects. The Buddha is not like this; meaning that since he knows all phenomena are entirely false, one cannot speak of having a cause or lacking a cause. Only relying on the vikalpa of grasper and grasped in false thoughts is pratītyasamutpāda conventionally posited; originally there is no real substantial entity, which is something those who cling to an ātman cannot perceive. Furthermore, nirvāṇa and the like are also merely three in count; how much less could one speak of maker and non-maker? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 7.29](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.7.29) - [Next: 7.31](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.7.31) - [Up: 7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.7) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791~en-mt.7.30) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.7.30](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.7.30) · Pramāṇa