[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [注大乘入楞伽經](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791) › 7.7 # 注大乘入楞伽經 7.7 注大乘入楞伽經 7.7 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [7.7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.7.7) 問：言說宗趣二義前文已明，今此再說豈非重繁乎？答：前約三乘，此約一乘。又前即先宗後說，此則先說後宗，機感有殊，故非重也。 > Question: The two meanings of verbal teaching and doctrine were already explained previously; why repeat them here—is this not redundant? Answer: Previously it was in terms of the three vehicles; here it is in terms of the one vehicle. Furthermore, previously the doctrine came first and the teaching followed; here the teaching comes first and the doctrine follows. The capacities and responses differ, so it is not redundant. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 7.6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.7.6) - [Next: 7.8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.7.8) - [Up: 7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.7) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791~en-mt.7.7) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.7.7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.7.7) · Pramāṇa