<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1795.1.698 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大方廣圓覺修多羅了義經略疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1795) › 1.698

# 大方廣圓覺修多羅了義經略疏 1.698

大方廣圓覺修多羅了義經略疏 1.698

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [1.698](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1795.1.698)

正觀之時各有所歸，即名為離，不說命終方名為離。故《庵提遮女了義經》說生死義云：「若能明知地、水、火、風四緣畢竟未曾自得有所和合以為生義；若知地、水、火、風畢竟不自得有所散是為死義。」此意正明即合而散、即散而合，故合、散之文皆為不自得。

> At the time of correct contemplation, each having its place of return is called 'separated'; it does not mean they are called separated only at the end of life. Thus the Strīvivarta-nītārtha-sūtra, speaking on the meaning of birth and death, says: 'If one can clearly know that the four conditions of earth, water, fire, and wind ultimately never self-attain any harmony, that is the meaning of birth; if one knows that earth, water, fire, and wind ultimately do not self-attain any dispersion, that is the meaning of death.' This meaning demonstrates that right in uniting there is dispersing, and right in dispersing there is uniting; thus the texts on uniting and dispersing both state they do not self-attain.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 1.697](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1795.1.697)
- [Next: 1.699](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1795.1.699)
- [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1795.1)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1795~en-mt.1.698) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1795.1.698](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1795.1.698) · Pramāṇa
