[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大毘盧遮那成佛經疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1796) › 5.23 # 大毘盧遮那成佛經疏 5.23 大毘盧遮那成佛經疏 5.23 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [5.23](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1796.5.23) 經云「所餘釋種尊，真言與印檀，所說一切法，師應具開示」者，如釋迦部中佛鉢錫杖印等，其類甚多，經不具出。但隨此方空缺處，採擇餘經所說，逐便安置之。設令缺之，亦無過咎。但經中所出上首諸尊等，必應一一如法畫之，不得遺謬。其蓮花部、金剛部等諸方，亦例此可知也。 > Regarding the verse stating: “As for the remaining deities of the Śākya clan, / Their mantras, seals, and altars, / And all the teachings spoken \[by them\], / The master should explain them fully”: this refers to items such as the Buddha's alms-bowl, the monk's staff seal, and so forth in the Śākya section. There are very many of this sort, and the sūtra does not mention them all. One simply follows the empty spaces in this direction, selects what is taught in other sūtras, and places them where convenient. Even if they are omitted, there is no fault. However, the foremost deities and others set forth in the sūtra must each be painted in accordance with the rules, without omission or error. The various directions of the Lotus section, Vajra section, and so forth are understood by analogy to this. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 5.22](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1796.5.22) - [Next: 5.24](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1796.5.24) - [Up: 5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1796.5) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1796~en-mt.5.23) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1796.5.23](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1796.5.23) · Pramāṇa