[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [首楞嚴義疏注經](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1799) › 3.146 # 首楞嚴義疏注經 3.146 首楞嚴義疏注經 3.146 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [3.146](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1799.3.146) 破轉救也。初二句牒救總徵。若汝救云：所生雖一，能生自二，云何令我頭手不異者，此則一體之觸為在何處？故云觸誰為在。在能下二句推同前破，前云若在於手，頭則無用等。不應下破空生也，有形之法尚不能生，豈況空無而能成觸。 > Refuting the shifted defense. The first two lines cite the defense and question it generally. If you defend by saying: 'Although that which is produced is one, those that produce it are naturally two; why force my head and hand not to be different?'—then where does this single touch reside? Hence it says: 'In which would the touch reside?' The two lines from 'if it resides in the agent' deduce the same refutation as before; previously it said, 'If it is in the hand, the head would have no function,' and so forth. From 'nor can' onward refutes its being born from space: even dharmas with form cannot produce it, how much less could empty nonexistence accomplish touch? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 3.145](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1799.3.145) - [Next: 3.147](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1799.3.147) - [Up: 3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1799.3) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1799~en-mt.3.146) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1799.3.146](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1799.3.146) · Pramāṇa