<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1799.3.47 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [首楞嚴義疏注經](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1799) › 3.47

# 首楞嚴義疏注經 3.47

首楞嚴義疏注經 3.47

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [3.47](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1799.3.47)

舌根不動喻真性，吻喻無明，舐喻真與妄合。勞即念動，念動故境生，如甜苦淡。問：甜苦由勞故生，可喻妄境。淡是舌根不動，合喻於真，為何喻境？答：元來不動可以喻真，今以由動故顯不動，既是形待，故成妄矣。如下云「言妄顯諸真，妄真同二妄。」餘如文。

> The tongue faculty not moving analogizes the true nature, the lips analogize avidyā, and licking analogizes the conjunction of the true and the false. Fatigue is the movement of thought; because thought moves, realms arise, such as sweet, bitter, and bland. Question: Sweetness and bitterness arise due to fatigue, and thus can analogize delusive realms. Blandness is the tongue faculty not moving and ought to analogize the real; why does it analogize a realm? Answer: Originally not moving can analogize the real; now, because it is revealed as not moving by means of movement, since it is a matter of relative contrast, it constitutes delusion. As it says below: "Speaking of delusion reveals the real; delusion and reality are equally two delusions." The rest is as in the text.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 3.46](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1799.3.46)
- [Next: 3.48](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1799.3.48)
- [Up: 3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1799.3)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1799~en-mt.3.47) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1799.3.47](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1799.3.47) · Pramāṇa
