[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [首楞嚴義疏注經](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1799) › 5.81 # 首楞嚴義疏注經 5.81 首楞嚴義疏注經 5.81 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [5.81](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1799.5.81) 由前偈云「解結因次第，六解一亦亡。」阿難疑意，前文既云根塵同源、縛脫無二，迷晦即無明、發明便解脫，斯則結無前後，解亦不倫。六根若亡，一覺應顯，云何復云解結因次、六解一亡，故云心猶未明、唯垂洗滌等。 > This is because the earlier verse said: "Untying knots depends upon sequence; / When the six are untied, the one also vanishes." The sense of Ānanda's doubt is: Since the earlier text stated that faculties and dusts share the same origin, and bondage and release are not two, delusion and obscurity being avidyā while illumination is liberation, then knots have no before or after, and untying them has no sequence either. If the six faculties vanish, the single awareness should become manifest; why then does he speak again of "untying knots depends upon sequence" and "when the six are untied, the one also vanishes"? Thus he says his mind is not yet clear and prays for defilements to be washed away. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 5.80](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1799.5.80) - [Next: 5.82](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1799.5.82) - [Up: 5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1799.5) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1799~en-mt.5.81) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1799.5.81](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1799.5.81) · Pramāṇa