<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1801.1.103 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [請觀音經疏闡義鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1801) › 1.103

# 請觀音經疏闡義鈔 1.103

請觀音經疏闡義鈔 1.103

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [1.103](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1801.1.103)

「豈有捨一取一」者，問：如菩薩本修圓行，則捨偏小，何言無取捨耶？答：取捨即無取捨。以圓觀權，實不離心性，豈可捨心性取心性耶？以唯見心性故。「然菩」下，雖知本具，當體空中而無所得，故無難苦及無分別。

> Regarding "how could there be discarding one and taking another?", Question: If the bodhisattva fundamentally cultivates the perfect practice, he discards the partial and small; how can you say there is no taking and discarding? Answer: Taking and discarding is precisely non-taking and non-discarding. Because he views the expedient through the perfect, it is truly not apart from mind-nature; how could one discard mind-nature to take mind-nature? This is because he sees only mind-nature. Below "however, the bodhisattva," although knowing it is fundamentally endowed, in its very essence it is empty and center, with nothing to be attained; hence there is no hardship or suffering, nor any conceptual discrimination.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 1.102](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1801.1.102)
- [Next: 1.104](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1801.1.104)
- [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1801.1)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1801~en-mt.1.103) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1801.1.103](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1801.1.103) · Pramāṇa
