[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [四分律刪繁補闕行事鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1804) › 2.239 # 四分律刪繁補闕行事鈔 2.239 四分律刪繁補闕行事鈔 2.239 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.239](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1804.2.239) 三所對境。《了論》解云：除自己及同類，餘三類眾生，隨一被教不被教，知比丘不得自取食食，又知此可食物，知比丘是受施人，度與比丘。若不解此義，雖與不成受。《多論》：為作證明故，若在人中，非人畜生，悉不成受。《五分》：曠野無淨人處，聽自洗燒器安水，淨人安米，自煮；若熟，從他受。《僧祇》：曠野中行，牛上受食。長袋連紐，一日一繫，置牛上，人不得觸之；至時，一比丘引繩，一比丘受取，口云受受等。《十誦》：蠅不可遮，故非觸。鳥來啄一口去，但棄啄處，餘殘得食。《善見》，天人鬼神畜生飛鳥皆成受。《五分》，迦葉從帝釋受食。《僧祇》中，獼猴邊受蜜。《十誦》，輕繫地獄，亦應得受。準此六道知解者成，反則不成。 > Third, the object confronted \[from whom food is received\]. The \*Vinayavibhāṣā\* explains: Excluding oneself and those of the same class, if any one of the remaining three classes of sentient beings, whether instructed or uninstructed, knows that a bhikṣu cannot take food to eat on his own, knows that this is edible food, and knows that the bhikṣu is a recipient of alms, and passes it to the bhikṣu—\[then receipt is effected\]. If they do not understand these points, even if they give it, it does not constitute receipt. The \*Sarvāstivāda-vinaya-vibhāṣā\* states: Because it serves as a witness, among humans, non-humans and animals cannot effect receipt. The \*Pañcavargika-vinaya\* states: In the wilderness where there is no kappiyakāraka, it is allowed to wash the cooking vessel oneself and pour in water; the kappiyakāraka puts in the rice, and one cooks it oneself; when cooked, one receives it from another. The \*Mahāsāṃghika-vinaya\* states: While traveling in the wilderness, receiving food upon an ox. A long sack with interconnected loops, tied once a day, is placed on an ox and people must not touch it; when the time comes, one bhikṣu pulls the cord, another bhikṣu receives it, saying verbally 'Received, received,' and so forth. The \*Daśādhyāya-vinaya\* states: Flies cannot be kept away, hence they do not constitute touch. If a bird comes and pecks a bite away, one merely discards the pecked spot, and the remainder may be eaten. The \*Samantapāsādikā\* states: Devas, humans, ghosts, spirits, animals, and flying birds can all effect receipt. In the \*Pañcavargika-vinaya\*, Kāśyapa received food from Śakra. In the \*Mahāsāṃghika-vinaya\*, honey was received from a monkey. In the \*Daśādhyāya-vinaya\*, \[beings in\] minor hells can also effect receipt. According to this, those among the six destinies who have discernment effect receipt; conversely, they do not. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.238](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1804.2.238) - [Next: 2.240](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1804.2.240) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1804.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1804~en-mt.2.239) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (1) - [四分戒本疏卷第一．第二．第三](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2787.3.80) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1804.2.239](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1804.2.239) · Pramāṇa