[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [四分律刪繁補闕行事鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1804) › 2.245 # 四分律刪繁補闕行事鈔 2.245 四分律刪繁補闕行事鈔 2.245 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.245](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1804.2.245) 九明失受法。一決意棄捨失。《了論》：若人不須此物，決捨此食，失受，更食得罪。二捨戒失。《了論》云：先受食已，後捨戒，餘比丘須者，更受。三捨命失。一切退沒故，即如亡人不淨食器，皆不須翻穢。四任運失。謂曾受四藥過時，法滿更無有受，如後律中。五轉變失。如麻出油、漿變成酒、酒變成醋、生變成熟，並失本受。若爾，《僧祇》中，何故展轉不失？答：此謂時中加記識故，後得無過；若時中不記者，皆不成法。六遇緣觸失。如《多論》淨人觸失，更洗手受。《僧祇》亦爾（今有重受而不洗手者，成受，皆無膩觸。但先洗手，意在淨心，非謂有污）。 > Ninth, clarifying the methods by which formal receipt is lost. First, loss by determined renunciation. The Vinayavibhāṣā \[states\]: If a person does not need this item and decisively abandons this food, the formal receipt is lost; eating it again incurs an offense. Second, loss by relinquishing the precepts. The Vinayavibhāṣā states: If one has previously formally received food and later relinquishes the precepts, if other bhikṣus need it, they must receive it again. Third, loss by loss of life. Because all is forfeited, just as with a deceased person's impure eating vessels, none require purifying reversal. Fourth, spontaneous loss. That is, having formally received the four types of medicines, when the time has passed, the Dharma is complete and there is no further receipt, as in the later Vinaya. Fifth, loss through transformation. As with sesame producing oil, juice turning into liquor, liquor turning into vinegar, or raw turning into cooked, all lose their original formal receipt. If so, why in the Mahāsāṃghika-vinaya is it not lost progressively? Answer: This refers to adding a notation within the proper time, so that later it is without fault; if not noted within the proper time, none constitute valid procedure. Sixth, loss through encountering a contact condition. As in the Sarvāstivāda-vinaya-vibhāṣā, if a kappiyakāraka touches it, \[the receipt\] is lost, and one must wash hands and receive it again. The Mahāsāṃghika-vinaya is also like this. (Today, those who receive again without washing hands effect a formal receipt, as all are free from greasy contact. But washing hands beforehand is intended to purify the mind, not meaning that there is defilement.) > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.244](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1804.2.244) - [Next: 2.246](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1804.2.246) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1804.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1804~en-mt.2.245) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1804.2.245](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1804.2.245) · Pramāṇa