[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [四分律刪繁補闕行事鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1804) › 2.98 # 四分律刪繁補闕行事鈔 2.98 四分律刪繁補闕行事鈔 2.98 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.98](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1804.2.98) 第四大妄語戒。具九緣：一對境是人，二人想，三境虛，四自知境虛，五有誑他心，六說過人法，七自言已證，八言章了，九前人解。《四分》、《十誦》、《多論》云：從得不淨觀已上，至四果來，若云我得，皆犯重。若現身相，前人不疑，同重；疑則偷蘭。《十誦》云：問：此不淨等，是近小法，何以犯重？答：是甘露初門，一切聖人，由之而入。又《四分》云：天龍鬼神，來供養我等，亦同犯重。又云：欲向此說，乃向彼說，一切皆重。《摩得伽》云：自稱是佛、天人師等，偷蘭。餘如《戒本疏》說。不犯中，律云：自知有得不淨觀，若向同意大比丘說；若戲笑、若疾疾說、屏處獨說；欲說此而錯說彼等。皆不犯重；而犯吉羅，以非言說之儀軌故也。 > Fourth, the precept against great false speech. It possesses nine conditions: first, the recipient is a human; second, one conceives of them as a human; third, the matter is false; fourth, one knows oneself that the matter is false; fifth, one has the intent to deceive others; sixth, one speaks of states beyond ordinary humans; seventh, one says oneself has realized them; eighth, the words and phrasing are clear; ninth, the other person understands. The Dharmaguptaka, Daśādhyāya, and Sarvāstivāda-vinaya-vibhāṣā state: From attaining the contemplation of the impure on up to the four fruits, if one says "I have attained it," all incur a grave offense. If one manifests physical signs and the other person has no doubt, it is likewise grave; if they doubt, it is a thullaccaya. The Daśādhyāya-vinaya states: Question: This impurity \[contemplation\] and the like are proximate, lesser dharmas; why does it incur a grave offense? Answer: It is the initial gate to the deathless; all noble persons enter through it. Furthermore, the Dharmaguptaka Vinaya states: Saying that devas, dragons, ghosts, or spirits come to make offerings to oneself, and the like, likewise incurs a grave offense. It also states: If one intends to speak to this person, but instead speaks to that person, all are grave. The Mātrikā states: Calling oneself a Buddha, a teacher of gods and humans, and the like, is a thullaccaya. The rest is as explained in the Commentary on the Prātimokṣa. Under non-offenses, the Vinaya states: If one knows oneself to have attained the contemplation of the impure, and speaks of it to an agreeable elder bhikṣu; or speaks in jest, or speaks hurriedly, or speaks alone in a secluded place; or intends to speak of this but mistakenly speaks of that—none of these incur a grave offense; however, one incurs a duṣkṛta, because it is not the proper decorum for speech. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.97](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1804.2.97) - [Next: 2.99](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1804.2.99) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1804.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1804~en-mt.2.98) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1804.2.98](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1804.2.98) · Pramāṇa