[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [四分律刪繁補闕行事鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1804) › 3.87 # 四分律刪繁補闕行事鈔 3.87 四分律刪繁補闕行事鈔 3.87 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [3.87](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1804.3.87) 第一絲、麻、毛、綿所作。《四分》中，坐褥、臥褥入重（並謂表裏有綿帛裝治者）。𣰽𣯫長五肘，廣三肘，毛長三指，入輕。此寒雪國中曲開𣰽𣯫，相同袈裟；條葉具足，毛內葉外，乃至皮作亦然；故開皮為臥具，此即三衣也。被是重物，不可例之，以《僧祇》中有氈僧伽梨故，自餘準此為量。被及被單入重。薄軟氈，堪可疊披入輕。𣰽𣯫、錦繡等，綺色分明，入重；律令壞色著之，猶同三衣相也。綾羅入輕；律開受王大價衣，及施主種種好衣；文中乃不明了，不妨含於貴價交𧚉等，入輕；下文聽著大價疎衣也。《僧祇》覆瘡衣、雨浴衣、漉水囊、二種腰帶、臥具，入輕。《五分》劫貝、單敷、儭身衣、針線囊、鉢囊、革屣囊，入輕。準此被單雖是從被，猶同儭身、單敷不異，可類在輕。錦綺毛𣯟、若氈、蚊厨等，入重。準此，《四分》減量者入輕，必依量硬厚，入重；不堪披著，不同𣰽𣯫法服，厚軟可服。毾㲪類同錦繡。雖是小氈，而屬床几者，相隨入重。五大色衣入輕。律中上色染衣、上色錦衣，聽作袈裟色畜。若真緋等判入重者，黃白不應入輕？白色佛制不著，尚判絹布入輕，例於黃、青、赤，亦應分也！若爾，氍氀佛制量入輕，不云色者，何判入重？答：彼離綺錯，外同三衣，條葉具足，同故入輕；準《五分》文，必純色者，準律非重。絲麻縷線，不問多少，義準入輕；必含繭、含稭，便入重色。盛衣袋者（前至臍後至腰），準《五分》入輕。連袋長袋被袋等入重。一切俗服、襦襖之類，已壞色折破入輕；猶是白色俗衣用服者入重。雜綵色線靴鞋，及餘男女衣服，補方巾袋等，並入重。繡綺鉢袋，隨鉢者入輕。 > First: those made of silk, hemp, wool, and cotton. In the Dharmaguptaka Vinaya, sitting pads and sleeping pads are classed as heavy (both referring to those made with cotton batting and silk linings). A woolen rug five cubits long, three cubits wide, with fleece three finger-breadths long, is classed as light. This is an exceptional allowance in cold, snowy lands for woolen rugs similar in form to the kāṣāya; fully equipped with strips and patches, with the wool inside and the patches outside, and even those made of skin are likewise; thus skin is permitted as bedding, which means the three robes. Quilts are heavy objects and cannot be treated analogously, because the Mahāsāṃghika-vinaya mentions felt saṃghāṭīs; the rest are measured according to this standard. Quilts and quilt sheets are classed as heavy. Thin, soft felt that can be folded and worn is classed as light. Woolen rugs, brocades, and embroideries with distinct, brilliant patterns are classed as heavy; the Vinaya requires that they be dyed in broken colours before wearing, still matching the form of the three robes. Damasks and silks are classed as light; the Vinaya allows receiving robes of great value from kings and all kinds of fine robes from donors; although the text is not explicit, it does not prevent including expensive interlaced patterned silks in the light category; a later passage allows wearing expensive, open-weave garments. In the Mahāsāṃghika-vinaya, wound-covering robes, rain-bathing robes, water-filtration strainers, the two kinds of waistbands, and bedding are classed as light. In the Pañcavargika-vinaya, cotton cloth, single-layer sheets, undergarments, needle-and-thread pouches, bowl pouches, and leather sandal pouches are classed as light. By this standard, although a quilt sheet belongs to the quilt, it is no different from an undergarment or single-layer sheet, and can be categorized as light. Patterned silk, fine wool blankets, felt, and mosquito nets are classed as heavy. According to this, those smaller than the prescribed measure in the Dharmaguptaka Vinaya are classed as light, while those of standard measure that are stiff and thick are classed as heavy; being unsuitable to wear as robes, they differ from woolen rugs used as Dharma robes, which are thick, soft, and wearable. Rugs are categorized together with brocades and embroideries. Even if it is a small felt mat, if it belongs to a couch or table, it is classed as heavy along with them. Robes of the five primary colours are classed as light. In the Vinaya, dyed robes of superior color and brocade robes of superior color are permitted to be kept after being turned into kāṣāya colors. If authentic crimson and the like are judged to be classed as heavy, should yellow and white not be classed as light? White is prohibited by the Buddha from being worn, yet plain silk and hemp cloth are still judged to be classed as light; by analogy, yellow, blue-green, and red should also be distinguished! If so, why are woolen rugs, which the Buddha prescribed to be classed as light based on size without mentioning color, judged to be classed as heavy? Answer: They are free from intricate patterns, externally match the three robes, and are fully equipped with strips and patches; being identical in this way, they are classed as light. Based on the text of the Pañcavargika-vinaya, if they are of a pure single color, according to the Vinaya they are not heavy. Silk and hemp threads, regardless of quantity, are theoretically classed as light; but if they still contain cocoons or stalks, they enter the heavy category. Clothes bags (reaching from the navel in front to the waist in back) are classed as light according to the Pañcavargika-vinaya. Connected bags, long bags, quilt bags, and the like are classed as heavy. All secular garments, jackets, and coats that have already been dyed in broken colors or torn and patched are classed as light; those that remain white secular garments for ordinary wear are classed as heavy. Boots and shoes made with multicolored threads, as well as remaining men's and women's clothing, patchwork kerchiefs, pouches, and the like, are all classed as heavy. Embroidered or patterned bowl pouches are classed as light, following the bowl. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 3.86](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1804.3.86) - [Next: 3.88](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1804.3.88) - [Up: 3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1804.3) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1804~en-mt.3.87) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1804.3.87](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1804.3.87) · Pramāṇa