[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [四分律行事鈔資持記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805) › 1.519 # 四分律行事鈔資持記 1.519 四分律行事鈔資持記 1.519 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.519](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.1.519) 內唱中，初出彼唱。便下，推過，初總示。如下，別釋為三，初釋別眾。以與欲出界，失法成別。若下，次釋破夏。依界者，對無界依藍，則無此過。言下，三釋離衣。以自然護衣，亦無此過，故約作法衣界明之。故下，結示。 > In \[the section on\] chanting within \[the boundary\]: first, \[the text\] presents their chanting. From "then..." onward, it deduces the fault; first, it points it out in general terms. From "such as..." onward, it explains it separately in three parts: first, it explains the division of the Saṃgha. Because conferring chanda outside the boundary forfeits the legal act, this constitutes a division of the Saṃgha. From "if..." onward, it next explains the rupture of the rains retreat. As for "relying on a boundary," by contrast with relying on a vihāra where there is no boundary, there is no such fault. As for "the words...", third, it explains separation from robes. Because a natural boundary protects the robes, there is also no such fault; thus it is explained in terms of a consecrated boundary for robes. From "therefore..." onward, it concludes and indicates \[the point\]. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.518](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.1.518) - [Next: 1.520](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.1.520) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805~en-mt.1.519) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.1.519](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.1.519) · Pramāṇa