[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [四分律行事鈔資持記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805) › 1.574 # 四分律行事鈔資持記 1.574 四分律行事鈔資持記 1.574 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.574](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.1.574) 棄捨失中。必約作意捨去，後更不還，無一人住，方名失界。疏云：雖非作法，僧義絕故；又引《文殊問經》云：下至有一優婆塞宿，是名不失。文中，前引《十誦》。明須作念，故知不作則不失也。《智論》。限定一宿，故知未宿還來，亦不失也。 > In \[the section on\] loss through abandonment: It must be that one deliberately abandons it and departs, never to return later, with not a single person dwelling there, before it is called losing the boundary. The Commentary states: "Although it is not \[by\] a ritual action, the principle of the Saṃgha has been severed." It also cites the Sūtra of Mañjuśrī's Questions: "Down to having even one upāsaka staying overnight, it is called not lost." In the text, it first cites the Daśādhyāya-vinaya, clarifying that one must formulate the thought; thus we know that if one does not formulate it, it is not lost. The Mahāprajñāpāramitopadeśa limits it to one overnight stay; thus we know that if one returns before staying overnight, it is also not lost. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.573](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.1.573) - [Next: 1.575](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.1.575) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805~en-mt.1.574) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.1.574](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.1.574) · Pramāṇa