[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [四分律行事鈔資持記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805) › 1.781 # 四分律行事鈔資持記 1.781 四分律行事鈔資持記 1.781 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.781](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.1.781) 他部中，《善見》。三種並號偷形，若據第二，正是盜法，所以《疏》中但言三種。（或恐寫誤，一字合在偷形字上，則同《義鈔》。）或可稱夏受禮，濫大僧形，故通標耳。初明偷形。言利養者，須約二種現前僧物。飲食供設，是彼所希，義無不受，所以下云為饑餓故是也。二偷和合者。律唯約法。論通四種，加臘禮利，並成障戒。故《疏》問云：偷和合者，應在羯磨，何以文中具列夏等？答：夏次禮儀及信施等，並是僧家六和表相；由有戒故，便有夏次等；以盜戒相，令他信之故也。若偷下，判斷得不。同前《四分》。引《五百問》，別證受禮。 > Under "other schools": In the \*Samantapāsādikā\*, all three are designated as "stealing the appearance." If based on the second, it is precisely stealing the Dharma; this is why the \*Commentary\* only speaks of "three kinds." (Or perhaps fearing a copyist error, where the character "one" should be above the characters "stealing the appearance," in which case it would match the \*Yichao\*.) Alternatively, it may be that by claiming rains-retreat seniority (varṣā) and receiving salutations, one deceptively takes the appearance of a fully ordained monk; hence it is generally designated thus. First, he explains stealing the appearance. The mention of "offerings" must be specified regarding the two kinds of property of the Saṃgha present. Food offerings are what he desires, and by principle there are none he would not accept; this is why it says below, "for the sake of hunger." Second, "stealing concord": The Vinaya specifies it only in terms of the Dharma. The treatise encompasses four kinds, adding rains-retreat seniority, salutations, and offerings; all become obstacles to the precepts. Therefore the \*Commentary\* asks: "Stealing concord should consist in the karma; why does the text list in full rains-retreat seniority and the rest?" The answer is: Rains-retreat seniority order, ceremonial etiquette, offerings made in faith, and the like are all manifest marks of the Saṃgha's six harmonies. Because there are precepts, there are therefore rains-retreat seniority and the like; it is because by stealing the marks of the precepts, he causes others to place faith in him. From "If stealing" onward, he determines whether one obtains \[the precepts\] or not; it is the same as the \*Dharmaguptaka-vinaya\* above. He cites the \*Five Hundred Questions\* as separate proof for receiving salutations. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.780](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.1.780) - [Next: 1.782](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.1.782) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805~en-mt.1.781) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.1.781](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.1.781) · Pramāṇa