<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.2.1376 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [四分律行事鈔資持記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805) › 2.1376

# 四分律行事鈔資持記 2.1376

四分律行事鈔資持記 2.1376

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [2.1376](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.2.1376)

釋第二中，《多論》，初明女飾。下簡男物。兵樂二器，捉亦犯吉，所以除之。矟所角反，矛之長者。若下，明使同類，能所俱重。律下，次引本律。即不犯中文。與上相違，故注決之。下引論證。顯非常開。

> In explaining the second \[condition\], the Sarvāstivāda Vinaya Vibhāṣā first clarifies women's ornaments. Below, it excludes men's articles. As for weapons and musical instruments, holding them also incurs a duṣkṛta, which is why they are excluded. For 矟 (lance), the pronunciation is suò (initial sh-, rhyme -uo); it is a long spear. Below, 'if...', it clarifies that employing peers makes both the employer and the employed incur a grave \[offense\]. Below, 'Vinaya...', it next cites the root Vinaya. This is the text under non-offenses. Because it contradicts the above, the commentary resolves it. Below, it cites a treatise to verify this, demonstrating that it is not a routine exception.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 2.1375](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.2.1375)
- [Next: 2.1377](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.2.1377)
- [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.2)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805~en-mt.2.1376) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.2.1376](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.2.1376) · Pramāṇa
