<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.2.2116 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [四分律行事鈔資持記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805) › 2.2116

# 四分律行事鈔資持記 2.2116

四分律行事鈔資持記 2.2116

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [2.2116](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.2.2116)

結告中，初指前所出。前之儀式，乃準本律《多論》兩文共成；然彼此互缺，故云各題也。準前論文有四，一乞懺，二請主，三白和，四對悔，缺此三法；本律有五，則無一三，故云不整蝢也。今下，明安布。且下，例通餘罪。

> Under the conclusion, it first points to what was set forth above. The preceding ceremony was established based on combining both texts of our own Vinaya and the Sarvāstivāda Vinaya Vibhāṣā; however, they mutually lacked certain parts, hence it says 'each formulated separately'. According to the preceding treatise text, there are four items: first, petitioning for confession; second, requesting the master; third, the motion of agreement; and fourth, confrontation-confession; yet it lacks these three procedures. Our own Vinaya has five, but lacks the first and third; hence it says 'not fully orderly'. From 'Now' onward explains the arrangement. From 'Provisionally' onward, by analogy, it extends to the remaining offenses.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 2.2115](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.2.2115)
- [Next: 2.2117](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.2.2117)
- [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.2)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805~en-mt.2.2116) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.2.2116](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.2.2116) · Pramāṇa
