[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [四分律行事鈔資持記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805) › 2.40 # 四分律行事鈔資持記 2.40 四分律行事鈔資持記 2.40 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.40](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.2.40) 會通中，初引三文。《四分》不成，不言多少。《了論》一品，不顯重輕。唯茲《十誦》，甚有眉目；疏引彼文，初二兩篇，各有遠近方便（彼唯立二方便），位分三階；初篇近者，界內僧懺（上品）；初篇遠者，二篇近者，界外四人悔（同是中品）；二篇遠者，一人前悔（下品。）準持犯中三罪，則依《了論》，遠者重吉，此據本宗；次近二蘭，全取《十誦》。然下，會同次罪。《十誦》中蘭，《了論》重吉；今欲用蘭替吉，略示令知，餘指如後。凡定罪體，必約懺論；中蘭據法，雖對小眾；正捨本罪，還同吉羅，一人對滅故。體通彼此者，即指兩文。類解者，令較二罪。 > In the reconciliation: it first cites three texts. In the \*Dharmaguptaka\*, where it is not accomplished, it does not state more or less. In the \*Vinayadvāviṃśatividyā-śāstra\*, there is only one category, which does not show heavy and light. Only this \*Daśādhyāya\* has very clear outlines; the commentary cites its text where the first two divisions each have distant and proximate preparatory stages (it posits only two preparatory stages), the positions being divided into three ranks: the proximate of the first division is confessed before the saṃgha within the boundary (superior rank); the distant of the first division and the proximate of the second division are repented before four persons outside the boundary (both being middling rank); the distant of the second division is repented before one person (inferior rank). Accompanying the three offenses in maintenance and violation, one relies on the \*Vinayadvāviṃśatividyā-śāstra\* for the distant being a heavy duṣkṛta—this is based on our own school; the intermediate and proximate two sthūlātyayas are entirely taken from the \*Daśādhyāya\*. The phrase 'however...' reconciles the intermediate offenses. The intermediate sthūlātyaya of the \*Daśādhyāya\* is the heavy duṣkṛta of the \*Vinayadvāviṃśatividyā-śāstra\*; now wishing to use sthūlātyaya to substitute for duṣkṛta, it shows this briefly to make it known, the rest being indicated below. Whenever determining the substance of an offense, one must discuss it in terms of repentance; although the intermediate sthūlātyaya relies on the Dharma before a minor assembly, in terms of actually relinquishing the root offense, it is still the same as a duṣkṛta, being extinguished before one person. 'The substance is common to both' points to the two texts. 'Understanding by analogy' causes one to compare the two offenses. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.39](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.2.39) - [Next: 2.41](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.2.41) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805~en-mt.2.40) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.2.40](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.2.40) · Pramāṇa