[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [四分律行事鈔資持記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805) › 2.466 # 四分律行事鈔資持記 2.466 四分律行事鈔資持記 2.466 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.466](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.2.466) 四中。如彼論解，稱佛犯蘭，有二義：一世間一佛，更無第二故；二具足相好，異於世人，無人信受故。今時即佛，便謂己是，不復進求，準同此犯。經云：一切眾生，皆有佛性；此指理同，須知事異；如氷即水，氷豈成流！似鑛即金，鑛無金用；豈得僣同上聖，惑彼下愚！恣懶慢以謂無修，作鄙穢而言妙用；若此即佛，何止汝徒；經說遮那遍一切處，則山河大地，全法王身；耎動翾飛，皆如來藏；此蓋都迷階漸，一混聖凡；滅法壞人，莫甚於此！自非達者，誰復鑒哉！下指如疏，文見二下。 > In the fourth: as explained in that treatise, claiming to be a Buddha incurs a sthūlātyaya, which has two meanings: first, in the world there is only one Buddha and no second; second, he is fully endowed with the marks and signs, distinct from people of the world, so no one would believe and accept it. Nowadays, those who claim 'this very mind is Buddha' then consider themselves to be so without further seeking progress, which by analogy conforms to this offense. The sūtra says: 'All sentient beings have the Buddha-nature.' This points to the identity of principle, but one must know the difference in phenomena; just as ice is water, how could ice flow! Like ore being gold, ore lacks the function of gold; how could one usurp the high sages and delude the ignorant below! Indulging in laziness and arrogance to claim there is no cultivation, performing vile and filthy acts and calling them wonderful functions; if this is Buddha, how could it be limited to your faction? The sūtra explains that Vairocana pervades all places; then the mountains, rivers, and great earth are entirely the body of the Dharma King; wriggling and flying creatures are all the Tathāgatagarbha; this is utterly confusing the stages and completely confounding sages and worldlings; destroying the Dharma and ruining people, nothing is worse than this! Unless one is an accomplished person, who could discern this? Below points to being as in the Commentary, the text of which appears in Part Two, below. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.465](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.2.465) - [Next: 2.467](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.2.467) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805~en-mt.2.466) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.2.466](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.2.466) · Pramāṇa