[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [四分律行事鈔資持記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805) › 2.732 # 四分律行事鈔資持記 2.732 四分律行事鈔資持記 2.732 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.732](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.2.732) 諸部中，初科，《多論》四節，初示名。彼宗戒本云：憍奢耶作教具，故論牒之。論失譯主，應是秦翻，故言秦地。若下，顯犯。言下，正名。注文出本翻意。古謂戒制被敷，迷名故耳。如疏廣斥。外下，示綿衣法。亦得作者，展轉來故。乞得犯者，制情過故。 > Under the various schools: In the first section, the \*Sarvāstivāda Vinaya Vibhāṣā\* has four parts. The first indicates the name. That school's prātimokṣa says: "Making teaching-utensils (jiaoju) with kauśeya"; hence the treatise takes it up. The treatise lost its translator's name, but it should have been translated under the Qin; thus it says "the land of Qin". From "If" below, it reveals the offense. From "The word" below, it rectifies the name. The interlinear commentary states the original intention of translation. The ancients considered the precept to forbid bedspreads, merely because they were confused about the name, as the Commentary broadly refutes. From "External" below, it shows the method for floss garments. "Also permitted to make" is because they came via transfer. "Offense if obtained by begging" is because excessive craving was prohibited. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.731](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.2.731) - [Next: 2.733](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.2.733) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805~en-mt.2.732) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.2.732](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.2.732) · Pramāṇa