<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.2.950 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [四分律行事鈔資持記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805) › 2.950

# 四分律行事鈔資持記 2.950

四分律行事鈔資持記 2.950

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [2.950](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.2.950)

《僧祇》。簡伴有四，並以若字分之。初病，二眠，三親，四愚。下文指廣，《戒疏》問云：有請及男，俱不說犯，何故唯除男耶（此難，戒本。）？答：言除男子，不勞更除請；若著請者，疑謂有男須請得說故。

> In the Mahāsāṃghika-vinaya, screening the companion has four cases, all distinguished by the word "if": first, sick; second, sleeping; third, relative; fourth, foolish. The text below refers to a fuller explanation. The Precept Commentary asks: "When there is a request and when there is a man present, neither is said to be an offense; why does it only exempt the man? (This challenges the prātimokṣa.)" Answer: "By saying it exempts a man, there is no need to additionally exempt a request; if 'request' were included, one might doubt and think that even when a man is present, one must still be requested before being permitted to speak."  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 2.949](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.2.949)
- [Next: 2.951](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.2.951)
- [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.2)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805~en-mt.2.950) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.2.950](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.2.950) · Pramāṇa
