[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [四分律行事鈔資持記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805) › 3.83 # 四分律行事鈔資持記 3.83 四分律行事鈔資持記 3.83 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [3.83](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.3.83) 次科，《僧祇》，初明脫著法；因下，二明帶紐；披下，三明齊整。初文又二，前明著三衣法，後明著內衣。初中上三句總示三衣。彼明比丘畜二副三衣，一副入聚落著（即受持新好者），一副在寺內著（長衣故者），是以三衣並有入聚落衣及園中衣。不得下，別示大衣，初明入聚脫舊著新法。園中衣，即寺內所著大衣也。（僧伽藍翻眾園，寺院通號，從本須達買園為名。）自近，自猶在也。從下，次明出聚脫新著舊法。出彼第三十五卷。彼具明大衣已，餘二衣準同，令文略之。注字釋疑，恐將園中衣為五條故。（古記反作五條釋之，或云移注於聚落衣下，或云梨合作藍，釋上園中字；如是妄說，皆由不尋本文。）後內衣中，出入二事，亦同上說；文中，初遮非法。前制出入，先求後脫，後制重著抽挽。應下，示如法。（古無解者，故此曲示。）帶紐行者，準似鈎紐，不綴衣上，未詳西土如何用之。 > In the next section, in the \*Mahāsāṃghika-vinaya\*, first it clarifies the method of taking off and putting on \[the robes\]; from 'Accordingly' onward, second, it clarifies the cords and fasteners; from 'Draping' onward, third, it clarifies neatness and orderliness. The first text also has two parts: first it explains the method of wearing the three robes, and afterward it explains the undergarments. In the first, the first three lines summarize the three robes. It explains that a bhikṣu keeps two sets of the three robes: one set worn when entering villages (namely the newly maintained, fine ones), and one set worn inside the monastery (the old, long-held robes). Thus, each of the three robes has a village robe and a park robe. From 'Must not' onward, it specifically indicates the great robe: first it explains the method of taking off the old and putting on the new when entering a village. The 'park robe' is the great robe worn inside the monastery. (Saṅghārāma translates as 'community park', a general designation for monasteries, derived originally from Sudatta's purchase of the park.) 'Beside oneself' (自近): \*zi\* (自) still means 'at' or 'by'. From 'From' onward, next it explains the method of taking off the new and putting on the old when leaving a village. This comes from its thirty-fifth fascicle. After it explains the great robe in full, the remaining two robes are understood likewise, so the text is abbreviated. The noted words dispel doubt, fearing that one might take the park robe to be the five-strip robe. (Ancient commentaries erroneously interpreted it as the five-strip robe, or said that the note should be moved below 'village robe', or said that \*li\* was mistakenly written for \*lan\* to explain the word 'park' above; such erroneous theories all arise from not examining the root text.) In the subsequent undergarments section, the two matters of going out and entering are also the same as explained above. Within the text, first it prevents non-dharmic practices. In the earlier regulation on going out and entering: first seek, then take off; in the later regulation on double wearing: pulling and drawing out. From 'Should' onward, it shows what is dharmic. (Ancient writers did not explain this, hence it is carefully detailed here.) The 'loose strap and loop' resembles a hook and fastener that is not attached to the robe; it is not yet clear how they were used in the Western lands. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 3.82](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.3.82) - [Next: 3.84](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.3.84) - [Up: 3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.3) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805~en-mt.3.83) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.3.83](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.3.83) · Pramāṇa