[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [四分律行事鈔資持記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805) › 3.91 # 四分律行事鈔資持記 3.91 四分律行事鈔資持記 3.91 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [3.91](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.3.91) 十一中，《五百問》三段，初明互著。無中衣者，謂闕七條。大衣本非入眾，闕故開之。小衣即五條淨者，亦開入眾。準此若闕大衣，下二應開入聚；若闕下衣，大衣不許作務，七條應得。注中，以道行中多著下衣，或有見塔而設禮者，論中無衣暫開，故知常途不許。今時入塔禮誦，多不易衣；薰觸靈儀，更增慢業，識者誡之。次明受食。制須法衣。三明借衣。制須在界。下引《十誦》。決上論文，似制三衣重著受食，或局受持。袈裟語通，隨著一事；或復餘長，皆無有過。言得罪者，準犯吉羅。（準此判犯不用前論。） > In \[item\] eleven, the "Five Hundred Questions" has three passages. The first clarifies wearing \[robes\] interchangeably. "Lacking an intermediate robe" means being deficient in the seven-strip robe. The great robe originally is not for entering the assembly, but because of a deficiency, an exception is granted for it. The minor robe, which is the clean five-strip robe, is also exceptionally permitted for entering the assembly. By this standard, if one lacks the great robe, the lower two should be exceptionally permitted for entering settlements; if one lacks the lower robe, the great robe is not permitted for performing chores, but the seven-strip robe should be admissible. In the note, because on the road one mostly wears the lower robe, there may be some who see a stūpa and make obeisance. The treatise temporarily grants an exception when one has no robe; hence we know that by the standard route it is not permitted. Nowadays, when entering a stūpa to pay homage and recite, many do not change robes; this touches and steams upon the numinous likeness, further increasing the karma of arrogance, which those who know should warn against. Next, receiving food is clarified. It is prohibited, requiring a Dharma robe. Third, borrowing a robe is clarified. It is prohibited, requiring that it be within the boundary. Below, the Daśādhyāya-vinaya is cited to resolve the treatise passage above, which seems to prohibit wearing the three robes piled up when receiving food, or to restrict it to \[robes kept by\] formal determination. The term "kāṣāya" is general, encompassing any single article worn; or again, surplus robes entail no fault. The statement that one incurs an offense corresponds to committing a duṣkṛta. (Judging an offense by this standard does not use the former treatise.) > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 3.90](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.3.90) - [Next: 3.92](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.3.92) - [Up: 3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.3) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805~en-mt.3.91) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.3.91](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1805.3.91) · Pramāṇa