[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [四分比丘戒本疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1807) › 1.41 # 四分比丘戒本疏 1.41 四分比丘戒本疏 1.41 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.41](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1807.1.41) 問：前房既已二殘合制，何不通收此殘為三？答：文詞便易，義又相因，是故前房二殘合制過量無量。義既相違，作法文詞復不便易，故別制也。 > Question: Since in the previous hut \[precept\] two saṃghāvaśeṣas were combined into one rule, why not also include this saṃghāvaśeṣa to make three? Answer: The phrasing was convenient and the meanings were mutually dependent, which is why in the previous hut \[precept\] the two saṃghāvaśeṣas were combined into one rule. \[Here,\] exceeding measurements and having no measurements are mutually contradictory in meaning, and the phrasing of the legal procedure is not convenient; therefore, a separate rule was instituted. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.40](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1807.1.40) - [Next: 1.42](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1807.1.42) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1807.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1807~en-mt.1.41) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1807.1.41](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1807.1.41) · Pramāṇa