[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [金剛般若論會釋](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816) › 1.62 # 金剛般若論會釋 1.62 金剛般若論會釋 1.62 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.62](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816.1.62) 問：「何故上說攝住處中，不以此五各別配文也？」答：「道理皆有，謂應生如是心，依義顯示對治不失心故；我皆令入無餘涅槃等，是說相；即此令入無餘涅槃，是攝持，攝持心即欲願；實無眾生得滅度者，是安立第一義；若有我相、人相、眾生、壽者相即不名菩薩，為顯現，是相應三昧及攝散心。」 > Question: “Why did the explanation of the abode of embracing above not match these five individually to the text?” Answer: “In principle, they are all present: namely, ‘one should give rise to such a mind’ is because it reveals the antidote of non-loss of mind based on the meaning; ‘I must cause all to enter into nirvāṇa without remainder,’ etc., is the stated characteristic; this very ‘causing them to enter into nirvāṇa without remainder’ is the sustaining, and the sustaining mind is precisely the wish and vow; ‘in reality, no sentient being attains extinction’ is the established ultimate truth; ‘if there is the mark of a self, the mark of a person, the mark of a sentient being, or the mark of a lived soul, one is not named a bodhisattva’ is for manifestation, which is the corresponding samādhi and the gathering of the scattered mind.” > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.61](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816.1.61) - [Next: 1.63](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816.1.63) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816~en-mt.1.62) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816.1.62](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816.1.62) · Pramāṇa