[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [金剛般若論會釋](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816) › 1.93 # 金剛般若論會釋 1.93 金剛般若論會釋 1.93 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.93](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816.1.93) 「於中，言當生實相者」下，配五種義，修行集因中生實相言是依義，即此中脩多羅句說是說相，即前當生實相是攝持，其二無我是安立，不應取法等是顯現。天親解云，「不應取法者，不應如聲取法」，除所執故；「非不取法者，隨順第一義智，正說如是取」，又非離言說可求第一義智，第一義智順教生故。此論意言，不應取法者，若所執有法及法無我並不分別，如言執著，皆不應取。不應取非法者，論雖不解，翻顯離言說外亦不可求，順教便生第一義智證真義故，正與彼同。又解，不應取法，謂取法體，如言執實，不應取故。不應取非法者，謂此教說法無我性，順教便生第一義智，不應離教以求真義證法無我故，不應依教而生執著法體分別，亦不應離教外覓法無我執著分別，亦與彼同。文牒經雖略，但牒不應取法，解中便具不應取非法。 > From "Therein, the statement 'will generate the true mark'" downwards correlates the five kinds of meaning. In the accumulation of causes in cultivation, the statement 'generates the true mark' is the meaning of the basis; the statement of the sūtra sentences right here is the mark of explanation; the aforementioned 'will generate the true mark' is embracing; the two selflessnesses are the establishment; and 'one should not grasp phenomena' and so on is the manifestation. Vasubandhu explains: "'One should not grasp phenomena' means one should not grasp phenomena according to the verbal expression," because of eliminating what is grasped; "'nor should one not grasp phenomena' means that, conforming to the wisdom of ultimate truth, it is correctly spoken and thus grasped," and furthermore, it is not possible to seek the wisdom of ultimate truth apart from verbal expressions, because the wisdom of ultimate truth arises conforming to the teaching. The intent of this treatise states: 'One should not grasp phenomena' means that regarding the imagined existent phenomena and the selflessness of phenomena, one does not conceptually differentiate either; grasping onto them according to words—none of these should be grasped. As for 'nor should one grasp non-phenomena', although the treatise does not explain it, it conversely reveals that outside of verbal expressions \[truth\] cannot be sought either, because conforming to the teaching directly gives rise to the wisdom of ultimate truth to realize the true meaning, which is precisely identical to that \[explanation\]. Another explanation: 'One should not grasp phenomena' refers to grasping the substance of phenomena, grasping it as real according to words, which should not be grasped. 'Nor should one grasp non-phenomena' refers to this teaching explaining the nature of the selflessness of phenomena; conforming to the teaching directly gives rise to the wisdom of ultimate truth, and one should not seek the true meaning apart from the teaching to realize the selflessness of phenomena; therefore, one should not rely on the teaching to generate grasping and conceptual differentiation toward the substance of phenomena, nor should one search outside the teaching for the selflessness of phenomena and generate grasping and conceptual differentiation; this is also identical to that. Although the citation of the sūtra in the text is brief, only citing 'one should not grasp phenomena', the explanation fully includes 'nor should one grasp non-phenomena'. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.92](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816.1.92) - [Next: 1.94](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816.1.94) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816~en-mt.1.93) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (1) - [金剛般若經贊述](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1700.1.173) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816.1.93](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816.1.93) · Pramāṇa