<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816.2.31 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [金剛般若論會釋](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816) › 2.31

# 金剛般若論會釋 2.31

金剛般若論會釋 2.31

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [2.31](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816.2.31)

論文分二，初、標名屬經，後、釋經義。此中為離不忍苦，舉所治障，顯能修行，前卷但言為忍苦故，但明意正行，以生下文。天親論云，廣為斷疑。云何疑？向說捨身苦，以彼捨身苦身果報，而彼福劣，依此法門受、持、演說菩薩行苦行，彼苦行亦是苦果，云何此法門身果報福勝，不感生死諸苦果耶？下文意說，前捨身命，不能忍苦，故感劣福，為法捨身，乃能忍苦，故感勝福。天親疑從前起，此論直釋彼文，各據其經，理無乖背。

> The treatise text is divided into two parts: first, indicating the title and assigning it to the sūtra; and finally, explaining the sūtra's meaning. Here, "in order to avoid the inability to endure suffering" adduces the obstacle to be eliminated and reveals the practice that can be cultivated. The preceding fascicle merely said "in order to endure suffering," which only clarified the primary mental practice to generate the subsequent text. Vasubandhu's treatise states: "It extensively dispels doubts." What are the doubts? Previously it spoke of the suffering of giving up one's body: that giving up one's body entails the suffering of bodily karmic retribution, and that merit is inferior; whereas relying on this Dharma-gate, bodhisattvas accept, uphold, expound, and practice austerities, and those austerities are also suffering retributions. Why is the bodily karmic merit of this Dharma-gate supreme and does not induce the various suffering retributions of saṃsāra? The meaning of the text below states: previously giving up body and life could not endure suffering, and therefore induced inferior merit; giving up the body for the Dharma is truly able to endure suffering, and therefore induces supreme merit. Vasubandhu's doubt arises from the preceding text, whereas this treatise directly explains that text. Each relies on its own sūtra, and in principle there is no contradiction.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 2.30](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816.2.30)
- [Next: 2.32](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816.2.32)
- [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816.2)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816~en-mt.2.31) — English, machine translation

## Linked texts (1)

- [金剛般若波羅蜜經論](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.prajnaparamita.vajracchedika!vajracchedikaprajnaparamitasutrasastra*zh-bodhiruci.2.15) — Classical Chinese

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816.2.31](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816.2.31) · Pramāṇa
