<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816.3.31 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [金剛般若論會釋](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816) › 3.31

# 金剛般若論會釋 3.31

金剛般若論會釋 3.31

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [3.31](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816.3.31)

自下大文第二舉佛菩薩因顯佛菩薩果有無上等覺，經文有二，初、正顯，後、破執。論隨解經，亦分為二，梁、什、魏本皆云修一切善法得阿耨菩提，從明佛因時具修一切善法滿足故得無上正等菩提，不同二乘。《大品經》第三十八說，一切善法是無上菩提因。須菩提白佛：「何等是一切善法？」佛言：「六波羅蜜、四念處等乃至十八不共法，皆是菩薩道菩薩行，是諸善法具足已，得一切種智，轉法輪度眾生。」轉法輪度眾生即復施設大利文，是此明佛具修一切善法故得無上覺等。若依真本及唐本，云一切善法無不現證，一切善法無不妙覺。論通說佛因因果，善法圓滿，謂無間道時，一切善法因滿足，微惑永盡，與諸佛同證寂滅忍，故言一切善法無不現證。至解脫道時，微苦亦盡，功德圓滿，與諸佛同名為妙覺，故言一切善法無不妙覺。因果皆悉不同二乘，故佛菩提有無上等覺語。次破執者，有人尋善法名起執故，約第一義說善法即非善法，論於此為安立第一義，破增益失；復恐撥無緣生善法，故約俗說是名善法，令離損減失。世親解云，是故彼漏非是淨法，此中說善，即是清淨無漏法故。又此善法無有漏，故名非善法，以漏無故，是名善法。由是唐本重言，善法或因果二，故重言也。

> From here below is the second major section, presenting the cause of the buddhas and bodhisattvas to reveal that the fruit of the buddhas and bodhisattvas possesses unexcelled, equal awakening. The sūtra text has two parts: first, directly revealing it; later, breaking attachment. The treatise follows in explaining the sūtra, likewise divided into two. The Liang, Kumārajīva, and Bodhiruci versions all say that by cultivating all wholesome phenomena one attains anuttarā-bodhi, following from clarifying that when the Buddha was in the causal stage he fully cultivated all wholesome phenomena to completion and therefore attained unexcelled, correct, and equal bodhi, unlike the two vehicles. Chapter thirty-eight of the Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā-prajñāpāramitā-sūtra states: all wholesome phenomena are the cause of unexcelled bodhi. Subhūti addressed the Buddha: 'What are all wholesome phenomena?' The Buddha said: 'The six pāramitās, the four stations of mindfulness, up to the eighteen unshared dharmas are all the bodhisattva path and bodhisattva practice; when these wholesome phenomena have been completed, one attains the knowledge of all aspects, turns the wheel of Dharma, and saves sentient beings.' Turning the wheel of Dharma and saving sentient beings is again the text setting forth great benefit; this clarifies that the Buddha, having fully cultivated all wholesome phenomena, therefore attained unexcelled awakening and the like. If based on Paramārtha's and the Tang versions, they say: 'Among all wholesome phenomena, none are not directly realized; among all wholesome phenomena, none are not wonderfully awakened to.' The treatise speaks comprehensively of the Buddha's cause, cause's fruit, and the perfection of wholesome phenomena: that is to say, at the time of the uninterrupted path, the causes of all wholesome phenomena are fulfilled, subtle confusion is permanently exhausted, and one equally realizes the endurance of cessation with all buddhas, hence it is said 'among all wholesome phenomena, none are not directly realized.' Arriving at the path of liberation, subtle suffering is also exhausted, merits are perfected, and one is equally named 'wonderfully awakened' with all buddhas, hence it is said 'among all wholesome phenomena, none are not wonderfully awakened to.' Cause and fruit are both completely unlike the two vehicles; therefore, the Buddha's bodhi has the phrase 'unexcelled equal awakening'. Next, as for breaking attachment: because some people, pursuing the name 'wholesome phenomena', give rise to attachment, it says in terms of the ultimate truth that wholesome phenomena are precisely non-wholesome phenomena. The treatise does this to establish the ultimate truth, destroying the error of superimposition; furthermore, fearing that people might repudiate and deny conditionally arisen wholesome phenomena, it therefore speaks in terms of conventional truth that 'they are called wholesome phenomena', causing them to abandon the error of deprecation. Vasubandhu explains: therefore, those tainted things are not pure phenomena; what is spoken of here as wholesome is precisely pure, untainted phenomena. Furthermore, because these wholesome phenomena have no taints, they are called non-wholesome phenomena; because taints are absent, they are called wholesome phenomena. For this reason, the Tang version repeats the words; or else it is repeated because of the two aspects of cause and fruit.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 3.30](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816.3.30)
- [Next: 3.32](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816.3.32)
- [Up: 3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816.3)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816~en-mt.3.31) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816.3.31](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816.3.31) · Pramāṇa
