[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [金剛般若論會釋](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816) › 3.3 # 金剛般若論會釋 3.3 金剛般若論會釋 3.3 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [3.3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816.3.3) 次第二釋善現安立第一義中，初、標其經，次、解其義。此有二意，一、為破前攝他為自大身執。若以平等心總攝自他為一身，非自非他，亦非自身，故論云，「於彼身安立非自非他」等。二、為破尋二身名起執故，雙安立二身為第一義，故論云，「此於妙身等中，安立第一義」，如是等。依真諦本及唐本此論本，皆雙安立二身即非身，令諸菩薩離增益失，又亦雙結，令離損減失。羅什本及魏本非結，皆闕妙身也。世親菩薩云，「非身者無有諸相」，「大身者有真如體，如是即名妙身、大身」。經在第三，佛為印可。什、魏二本不正，餘本皆云，「佛言：『如是，如是須菩提』」，以須菩提安立二身合理，故重印可。 > Next, in the second \[part\], explaining Subhūti establishing the ultimate truth: first, indicating the sūtra text; next, explaining its meaning. This has two intents. First, to refute the previous grasping that embraces others into one's own great body: if with an equal mind one completely embraces self and other into a single body, it is neither self nor other, nor is it one's own body; hence the treatise says: “Regarding that body, it is established as neither self nor other,” and so forth. Second, to refute the grasping that arises from pursuing the names of the two bodies: both bodies are jointly established as the ultimate truth; hence the treatise says: “This, in the marvelous body and so forth, establishes the ultimate truth,” and so on. According to Paramārtha's version and the Tang version of this treatise text, both jointly establish that the two bodies are no-body, causing bodhisattvas to be free from the fault of reification, and also jointly conclude, causing them to be free from the fault of deprecation. Kumārajīva's version and the Wei version do not conclude, both lacking the marvelous body. Bodhisattva Vasubandhu says: “‘No-body’ means lacking all characteristics”; “‘great body’ means possessing the essence of tathatā; such is named the marvelous body and the great body.” In the third \[part\] of the sūtra, the Buddha ratifies it. The two versions of Kumārajīva and the Wei are not correct; all other versions say: “The Buddha said: ‘So it is, so it is, Subhūti,’” because Subhūti's establishment of the two bodies accords with reason, so \[the Buddha\] repeatedly ratifies it. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 3.2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816.3.2) - [Next: 3.4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816.3.4) - [Up: 3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816.3) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816~en-mt.3.3) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816.3.3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1816.3.3) · Pramāṇa