<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1818.1.46 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [法華論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1818) › 1.46

# 法華論疏 1.46

法華論疏 1.46

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [1.46](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1818.1.46)

「與大比丘」下，第二牒眾成就分也。什譯經有三：一聲聞、二菩薩、三人天眾。今但牒前二，以二眾有歎德，今欲釋之，故牒；以人天眾無歎德，又易解兼餘經已釋，故不牒之。就牒二眾，即二：牒聲聞眾中，舊經有比丘、比丘尼，今但牒比丘。比丘眾中有二：一顯名、二密行，今但牒顯名，不牒密行，竝為易解兼不歎德故也。比丘中有六：一標通號、二唱數、三明位、四歎德、五列名、六總結。今但列初四，不列後二。而論釋中不釋初一通號及第五列名。

> From 'together with the great bhikṣus' downward is the second part, citing the section on the fulfillment of the assembly. Kumārajīva's translation of the sūtra has three \[groups\]: first, śrāvakas; second, bodhisattvas; third, the assembly of humans and devas. Here it cites only the first two, because these two assemblies have praised virtues and he now wishes to explain them, hence he cites them; because the assembly of humans and devas has no praised virtues, is easily understood, and has already been explained in other sūtras, he does not cite it. Regarding the citation of the two assemblies, there are two: in citing the śrāvaka assembly, the old sūtra has bhikṣus and bhikṣuṇīs, but here he cites only bhikṣus. In the assembly of bhikṣus there are two aspects: first, the manifest names; second, the hidden practices. Here he cites only the manifest names and not the hidden practices, both because they are easy to understand and because they lack praised virtues. Among the bhikṣus there are six headings: first, stating the general designation; second, declaring the number; third, clarifying the status; fourth, praising the virtues; fifth, listing the names; sixth, the general conclusion. Here he lists only the first four and does not list the latter two. Furthermore, the commentary in the treatise does not explain the first general designation or the fifth listing of names.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 1.45](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1818.1.45)
- [Next: 1.47](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1818.1.47)
- [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1818.1)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1818~en-mt.1.46) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1818.1.46](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1818.1.46) · Pramāṇa
