<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1819.1.77 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [無量壽經優婆提舍願生偈註](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1819) › 1.77

# 無量壽經優婆提舍願生偈註 1.77

無量壽經優婆提舍願生偈註 1.77

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [1.77](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1819.1.77)

問曰：上章云身不動搖而遍至十方。不動而至，豈非是一時義耶？與此若為差別？答曰：上但言不動而至，或容有前後；此言無前無後，是為差別。亦是成上不動義。若不一時則是往來，若有往來則非不動，是故為成上不動義，故須觀一時。

> Question: The preceding section stated that 'without moving their bodies, they reach the ten directions everywhere.' Does reaching \[everywhere\] without moving not imply 'simultaneity'? What difference is there between that and this? Answer: The preceding section only stated reaching without moving, which might still admit of before and after. Here it says there is neither before nor after; that is the difference. It also establishes the meaning of 'unmoving' above: if it were not simultaneous, then there would be coming and going; and if there were coming and going, it would not be unmoving. Therefore, to establish the meaning of 'unmoving' above, one must contemplate simultaneity.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 1.76](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1819.1.76)
- [Next: 1.78](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1819.1.78)
- [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1819.1)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1819~en-mt.1.77) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1819.1.77](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1819.1.77) · Pramāṇa
