[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821) › 10.184 # 俱舍論記 10.184 俱舍論記 10.184 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [10.184](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.10.184) 「有段非食至皆有四句」者，答。第一句，可飲噉故名段，損根、大故非食。第二句，謂餘三食能資益故名食，非飲噉故非段。第三句，可飲噉故名段，益根、大故名食。第四句，除前相。觸等三食皆有四句。《集異門》第一云「問：諸觸皆是食耶？答：應作四句。有觸非食，謂無漏觸及有漏觸為緣損壞諸根、大種。有食非觸，謂餘三食。有觸亦食，謂有漏觸為緣資益諸根大種。有非觸非食，謂除前相。如觸食四句意，思及識應知亦爾。」 > "There is what is solid but not nutriment... there are four alternatives for all" is the answer. In the first alternative, because it can be drunk or eaten, it is called solid, but because it damages the faculties and the primary elements, it is not nutriment. In the second alternative, because the other three nutriments are able to nourish, they are called nutriments, but because they are not drunk or eaten, they are not solid. In the third alternative, because it can be drunk or eaten, it is called solid, and because it benefits the faculties and the primary elements, it is called nutriment. The fourth alternative excludes the preceding characteristics. There are four alternatives for each of the three nutriments of contact and the rest. Fascicle 1 of the Saṅgītiparyāya states: "Question: Is all contact nutriment? Answer: One should make four alternatives. There is contact that is not nutriment: namely, anāsrava contact, and sāsrava contact that acts as a condition damaging the faculties and primary elements. There is nutriment that is not contact: namely, the other three nutriments. There is what is both contact and nutriment: namely, sāsrava contact that acts as a condition nourishing the faculties and primary elements. There is what is neither contact nor nutriment: namely, excluding the preceding characteristics. As with the meaning of the four alternatives for the nutriment of contact, volition and consciousness should be understood to be likewise." > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 10.183](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.10.183) - [Next: 10.185](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.10.185) - [Up: 10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.10) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821~en-mt.10.184) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (1) - [俱舍論頌疏論本](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1823.10.75) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.10.184](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.10.184) · Pramāṇa