[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821) › 13.41 # 俱舍論記 13.41 俱舍論記 13.41 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [13.41](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.13.41) 「或於一切至皆有剎那故」者，重破勝論義，乘彼起故。汝勝論師，或於一切有為法中，剎那剎那皆可計度有此法、非法，為生、滅因義。雖復汝計法與非法生滅因異，即許有為剎那生滅。既恒生滅，是即本與正量部諍無剎那滅便應止息，由許不待餘火等滅因皆有剎那故。又解：重破二執。或於一切有為法中，剎那剎那皆可計度有此住無滅因義，有此法、非法滅因義。既爾，本諍無剎那滅便應止息，同許不待餘火等滅因皆有剎那故。又解：重破正量部。汝正量部或於一切有為法中，剎那剎那皆可計度有此主因滅義。既爾，與正量部諍無剎那滅便應止息，以不待餘火等滅因皆有剎那故。 > \[On the text,\] "Or, in all … because all possess momentariness": This re-refutes the Vaiśeṣika doctrine, continuing from that discussion. You, the Vaiśeṣika master, could also imagine that in all conditioned phenomena, from moment to moment, there is this dharma and adharma acting as the cause of arising and destruction. Although you posit that dharma and adharma are distinct causes for arising and destruction, you thereby concede that conditioned phenomena arise and perish moment by moment. Since they continually arise and perish, your fundamental dispute with the Sammatīya over the absence of momentary destruction ought to cease, because by conceding that \[destruction\] does not depend on extraneous causes of destruction such as fire, all possess momentariness. Another explanation: This re-refutes both attachments. Or, in all conditioned phenomena, one could imagine from moment to moment that there is this cause of destruction consisting in the nonexistence of duration, or this cause of destruction consisting in dharma and adharma. If so, the fundamental dispute over the absence of momentary destruction ought to cease, because both agree that, not depending on extraneous causes of destruction such as fire, all possess momentariness. Another explanation: This re-refutes the Sammatīya. You, the Sammatīya, could also imagine that in all conditioned phenomena, from moment to moment, there is this primary cause of destruction. If so, your dispute with the Sammatīya over the absence of momentary destruction ought to cease, because by not depending on extraneous causes of destruction such as fire, all possess momentariness. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 13.40](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.13.40) - [Next: 13.42](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.13.42) - [Up: 13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.13) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821~en-mt.13.41) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.13.41](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.13.41) · Pramāṇa