<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.14.20 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821) › 14.20

# 俱舍論記 14.20

俱舍論記 14.20

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [14.20](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.14.20)

「近事近住至苾芻律儀」者，此即第二安立四律儀。塗香飾鬘為一，觀舞聽歌為一。又解：不得舞、不得歌、不得觀、不得聽，故至十中開為二種。問：何故八合十開？解云：於在家人其過輕故二合為一，於出家眾譏嫌重故開一為二。又《婆沙》云「謂離塗飾香鬘與離歌舞倡伎，同於莊嚴處轉故，合立一支。」又《正理》三十六云「為引怯怖眾多學處在家有情，顯易受持故，於八戒合二為一。」問：受畜金等，何故不立近住戒中，在十戒中？解云：在家耽著金、銀等寶未能遠離，故近住戒不制此戒。勤策、出家不應耽著金、銀等寶妨癈修道，故於十戒別立為一。若受離諸所應遠離身、語惡業，立第四戒。餘文可知。

> "Upāsaka, upavāsa \[...\] up to bhikṣu discipline" is the second section, establishing the four disciplines. Anointing with perfumes and wearing garlands make one precept, and watching dances and listening to songs make another. Another explanation: one must not dance, sing, watch, or listen; hence, when arriving at the ten \[precepts\], they are opened into two kinds. Question: Why are they combined into eight and opened into ten? The explanation says: for householders the fault is slight, so the two are combined into one; for the renunciant community criticism and suspicion are grave, so one is opened into two. Furthermore, the Vibhāṣā says: "Because abstaining from anointing with perfumes and garlands and abstaining from songs, dances, and entertainments both function with respect to bodily ornament, they are combined and established as a single branch." Furthermore, the Nyāyānusāra, fascicle 36, says: "In order to attract householder sentient beings who are timid and fearful of numerous rules of training, and to show that it is easy to accept and maintain, two are combined into one among the eight precepts." Question: Why is receiving and keeping gold and so forth not established among the upavāsa precepts, but included among the ten precepts? The explanation says: householders are indulgently attached to gold, silver, and other treasures and are not yet able to stay away from them, so the upavāsa discipline does not institute this precept. Śrāmaṇeras and renunciants should not be indulgently attached to gold, silver, and other treasures to the hindrance and ruin of their cultivation of the path; therefore, it is separately established as one among the ten precepts. If one undertakes to abstain from all bodily and vocal misdeeds that should be avoided, that constitutes the fourth precept. The remainder of the text is understandable.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 14.19](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.14.19)
- [Next: 14.21](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.14.21)
- [Up: 14](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.14)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821~en-mt.14.20) — English, machine translation

## Linked texts (1)

- [俱舍論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.14.24) — Classical Chinese

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.14.20](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.14.20) · Pramāṇa
