<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.14.92 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821) › 14.92

# 俱舍論記 14.92

俱舍論記 14.92

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [14.92](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.14.92)

「經部師說至阿世耶故」者，述經部宗。經部師說：如善律儀思種假立，無別實物名為無表。意樂是思，或意樂者所有意趣，或欲為體，或勝解為體，或欲、勝解為體。此不律儀，准善律儀亦應非實。熏成即欲造惡不善，意樂思種相續不捨，名不律儀。又解：由彼要期即欲造惡，現行思力熏成不善意樂思種相續不捨，名不律儀。此前兩解，意樂以思為體。又解：熏成即欲造惡不善，意樂相應思種相續不捨，名不律儀。又解：由彼要期即欲造惡，現行思力熏成不善意樂相應思種相續不捨，名不律儀。此前兩解，意樂非思，勝故別標。由此思種，後時善心雖復現起，而名成就不律儀人，以不捨此阿世耶故。阿世耶，此云意樂。

> "The Sautrāntika masters say... because of the āśaya" expounds the Sautrāntika tenet. The Sautrāntika masters say: just as the good restraint is nominally designated based on seeds of volition (cetanā-bīja) without any distinct real entity called non-information (avijñapti), intention (āśaya) is volition; or intention is the mind's purpose, having desire (chanda) as its nature, or having firm resolve (adhimokṣa) as its nature, or having both desire and firm resolve as its nature. This non-restraint, by analogy with good restraint, must likewise not be real. When perfumed into existence, it is the intention to commit evil and unwholesomeness—the unbroken continuum of seeds of volition not abandoned—which is called non-restraint. Another explanation: through that commitment, intending to commit evil, the power of active volition perfumes into existence unwholesome intentions, whose seeds of volition continue unbroken without being abandoned, which is called non-restraint. In the previous two explanations, intention has volition as its nature. Another explanation: perfumed into existence, it is the intention to commit evil and unwholesomeness; the seeds of volition associated with that intention continue unbroken without being abandoned, which is called non-restraint. Another explanation: through that commitment, intending to commit evil, the power of active volition perfumes into existence seeds of volition associated with unwholesome intentions, continuing unbroken without being abandoned, which is called non-restraint. In these latter two explanations, intention is not volition, but being predominant it is singled out. Due to these seeds of volition, even though a wholesome mind may subsequently arise, one is still designated as a person possessing non-restraint, because this āśaya has not been abandoned. Āśaya is translated here as intention (意樂).  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 14.91](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.14.91)
- [Next: 14.93](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.14.93)
- [Up: 14](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.14)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821~en-mt.14.92) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.14.92](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.14.92) · Pramāṇa
