[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821) › 2.11 # 俱舍論記 2.11 俱舍論記 2.11 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.2.11) 「若於彼法至名為所緣」者，答境界有對。若於彼色等境，此眼、耳等有見、聞等取境功能，即說彼色等為此眼等境。功能所託，名為境界。如人於彼有勝功能，便說彼為我之境界。此約有能，非要起用，故彼同分仍名有對。所緣有對，謂心、心所其性羸劣非境不生，猶如羸人非杖不起。執所緣境方起至現，現謂起彼取果用故。彼所緣於心等名為所緣，此約有緣其用得起，無緣不起。皆名有對，非必起者，故未來心等亦名有對。若境界有對，據礙取境用；若所緣有對，據礙取果用。如彼同分眼，雖不對境，取果之用任運得生。然彼眼等非所緣有對，故知礙取境用名境界有對，礙取果用名所緣有對。又解：礙體義邊名所緣有對，礙用義邊名境界有對。如彼同分眼，體雖恒有，無見色能，不名境界有對。以此准知，境界約用，所緣據體。又解：礙取境用名境界有對，礙緣境用名所緣有對。 > "If toward that dharma ... is named an objective support" answers cognitive-field resistance. If toward that cognitive field of visible form or the like, this eye, ear, etc. have the capacity to apprehend the object such as seeing or hearing, then that visible form or the like is said to be the cognitive field of this eye and the like. That upon which capacity relies is named a "cognitive field". Just as when a person has superior ability in a certain area, they then declare that to be "my field". This is based on possessing the capacity, not necessarily on activating the function; therefore, the tat-sabhāga is still named "possessing resistance". "Possessing objective-support resistance" means that mind and mental factors, by nature being weak and frail, do not arise without an object, just as a frail person cannot stand up without a staff. Taking hold of the objective-support field, they only then arise and manifest; "manifesting" means giving rise to that function of seizing a fruit. That objective support is named an "objective support" with respect to the mind and the like; this is based on their function being able to arise when having an object, and not arising without an object. They are all named "possessing resistance" without necessarily having arisen; therefore, future minds and the like are also named "possessing resistance". If it is cognitive-field resistance, it is based on obstructing the function of apprehending an object; if it is objective-support resistance, it is based on obstructing the function of seizing a fruit. For instance, in the case of a tat-sabhāga eye, although it does not face an object, its function of seizing a fruit arises spontaneously. Yet that eye and the like do not possess objective-support resistance; therefore one knows that obstructing the function of apprehending an object is named cognitive-field resistance, and obstructing the function of seizing a fruit is named objective-support resistance. Another explanation: on the side of obstructing the essence, it is named objective-support resistance; on the side of obstructing the function, it is named cognitive-field resistance. For instance, although the essence of a tat-sabhāga eye is constantly present, it lacks the capacity to see form, so it is not named cognitive-field resistance. By this we may know that cognitive field concerns function, while objective support is based on essence. Another explanation: obstructing the function of apprehending an object is named cognitive-field resistance, and obstructing the function of taking an object as cognitive support is named objective-support resistance. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.2.10) - [Next: 2.12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.2.12) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821~en-mt.2.11) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (1) - [俱舍論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.2.11) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.2.11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.2.11) · Pramāṇa