<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.2.36 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821) › 2.36

# 俱舍論記 2.36

俱舍論記 2.36

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [2.36](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.2.36)

「有雖無用至而非無因」者，前師又釋。論主若言諸根依處不由根生，要由見色聞聲等用根方生者，凡有根生非要有用，如處胞胎業定死者，雖無見色等用，其根亦生，故知根生非要有用。伏難云：此根無用，應非因生。為通伏難故作是言，有雖無用而非無因。此總出理。問：前解二根於彼有用，今言無用，豈不相違？解云：前言有用，有展轉疎用。今言無用，無親作用，非現嚴身、非現起說。或被難轉計。

> Regarding the passage: "Although some exist without a use \[…\] yet they are not without a cause," the previous master explains further. If the author of the treatise asserts that the physical bases of the faculties are not produced from the faculties, but rather that a faculty is produced only through functions such as seeing visible forms and hearing sounds, \[we reply that\] whenever a faculty is produced, it is not necessarily because it has a use. For example, for those who are destined by karma to die while in the womb, although they lack functions such as seeing forms, their faculties are nevertheless produced; hence we know that the production of faculties is not necessarily dependent on having a use. An implicit objection says: since these faculties have no use, they should not be produced from a cause. To resolve this implicit objection, he makes this statement: although some exist without a use, yet they are not without a cause. This provides the general principle. Question: The earlier explanation said the two faculties have a use there, but now it is said they have no use; is this not contradictory? Explanation: The earlier statement that they have a use referred to an indirect, mediate use. The present statement that they have no use means they have no direct, immediate function: they do not presently adorn the body, nor do they presently initiate speech. Or it is a modification of the position under the pressure of the objection.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 2.35](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.2.35)
- [Next: 2.37](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.2.37)
- [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.2)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821~en-mt.2.36) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.2.36](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.2.36) · Pramāṇa
