[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821) › 2.52 # 俱舍論記 2.52 俱舍論記 2.52 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.52](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.2.52) 「若五識身至無分別耶」者，此即第二釋妨問起。若五識身有尋、伺，尋體即是自性分別，如何經說無分別耶？ > Regarding "If the five consciousness-bodies... why are they non-conceptual?": This is the second section, raising an objection to clear away doubt. If the five consciousness-bodies have reflection and investigation, and the intrinsic nature of reflection is itself intrinsic conceptualization (svabhāva-vikalpa), why does the sūtra state that they are non-conceptual? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.51](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.2.51) - [Next: 2.53](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.2.53) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821~en-mt.2.52) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (1) - [俱舍論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.2.57) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.2.52](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.2.52) · Pramāṇa