[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821) › 2.56 # 俱舍論記 2.56 俱舍論記 2.56 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.56](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.2.56) 「自性分別至自當辨釋」者，指同後解，六識相應諸尋皆是自性分別。問：若體唯尋，何故《婆沙》四十二云「自性分別謂尋、伺。」解云：此論從強說，故唯說尋。婆沙強弱竝說，故通尋、伺，或略而不說，或舉初顯後，或論意不同。 > Regarding "Intrinsic conceptualization... will be explained and analyzed later": This refers forward to the explanation below that all instances of reflection associated with the six consciousnesses are intrinsic conceptualization. Question: If the essence is reflection alone, why does fascicle forty-two of the \*Mahāvibhāṣā\* state, "Intrinsic conceptualization refers to reflection and investigation"? Explanation: This treatise speaks from the predominant perspective, hence it mentions reflection alone. The \*Mahāvibhāṣā\* mentions both the strong and the weak, hence it encompasses both reflection and investigation; alternatively, it is omitted for brevity; or mentioning the first illuminates the second; or the treatise masters held different viewpoints. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.55](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.2.55) - [Next: 2.57](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.2.57) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821~en-mt.2.56) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.2.56](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.2.56) · Pramāṇa