[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821) › 25.55 # 俱舍論記 25.55 俱舍論記 25.55 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [25.55](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.25.55) 「頌曰至如無學位」者，答。由先凡位有六種故，有學有六。由前有學有六種故，應果有六。見道速疾無起加行，餘位得起能修練根。唯於信解異生位中能修練根，如無學位。《婆沙》第七云「順解脫分亦有六種，謂退種姓乃至不動種姓。轉退法種姓順解脫分，起思法種姓順解脫分，乃至轉堪達起不動法，轉聲聞起獨覺及佛，轉獨覺起聲聞及佛。若起佛種姓順解脫分已，即不可轉，極猛利故。又說：順決擇分亦有六性。」問：若言凡位順解脫分亦有六種姓，何故《婆沙》六十八但說決擇分有六種姓，不說前位？故彼論云「如見道位有六種性，相應行地亦有此六種姓，謂相應行退法種姓，乃至相應行不動法種姓。此地中有六種姓者，謂煖、頂、忍、世第一法，此是聖道近加行故，緣諦行相似聖道故，依身及定同見道故。前位不爾，故不立六種姓。」解云：後文且據一相，前文具說學位。轉根加行道等，如後當說。 > "The verse says: \[…\] as in the stage of the aśaikṣa": this is the answer. Because in the prior stage of an ordinary being there are six kinds, trainees have six. Because in the prior stage of trainees there are six kinds, arhats have six. Because the path of vision (darśana-mārga) is rapid, there is no giving rise to preparation; in the other stages it can arise and cultivate the training of faculties. Only in the stages of faith-adherent (śraddhādhimukta) and ordinary worldling can one cultivate the training of faculties, just as in the stage of an aśaikṣa. Fascicle 7 of the Mahāvibhāṣā says: 'Aids to liberation (mokṣa-bhāgīya) also have six kinds, from the parihāṇa-gotra up to the akopya-gotra. Transforming the parihāṇa-dharman lineage of aids to liberation, one gives rise to the cetanā-dharman lineage of aids to liberation, up to transforming prativedhanā to give rise to akopya-dharma; transforming a śrāvaka to give rise to a pratyekabuddha and a Buddha; transforming a pratyekabuddha to give rise to a śrāvaka and a Buddha. If one has given rise to the aids to liberation of the Buddha-lineage, it cannot be transformed, because it is extremely sharp. It is also said: aids to penetration (nirvedha-bhāgīya) also have six natures.' Question: If it is said that the aids to liberation in the ordinary stage also have six lineages, why does fascicle 68 of the Mahāvibhāṣā only state that the aids to penetration have six lineages and not mention the prior stage? Thus that treatise says: 'Just as the stage of the path of vision has six lineages, the stage of associated practice (samprayukta-vihāra-bhūmi) also has these six lineages, namely the associated practice parihāṇa-dharma lineage up to the associated practice akopya-dharma lineage. That there are six lineages in this stage refers to heat, summit, patience, and supreme worldly dharmas, because these are proximate preparations for the noble path, because their objects and modes of practice regarding the Truths resemble the noble path, and because their supporting physical bases and concentrations are identical to the path of vision. The prior stages are not like this, so six lineages are not established.' The explanation is: the later text merely relies on one aspect, while the earlier text fully explains the trainee stage. The preparatory path for transforming faculties and so forth will be explained later. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 25.54](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.25.54) - [Next: 25.56](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.25.56) - [Up: 25](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.25) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821~en-mt.25.55) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (1) - [俱舍論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.25.81) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.25.55](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.25.55) · Pramāṇa