[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821) › 26.131 # 俱舍論記 26.131 俱舍論記 26.131 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [26.131](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.26.131) 「俗智曾於至種姓多故」者，答。俗智數曾於三諦中知、斷、證故，現觀邊修俗智。曾於道無事現觀，故不名修。道非為一事故，道類智不修世俗。又必無於道遍事現觀故，謂於三界苦、集、滅三，可遍知苦、可遍斷集、可遍證滅，故現觀邊能修俗智。必無於道可能遍修，故現觀邊不修俗智。雖集諦邊未斷一切集盡，而於當集位斷集已周；雖滅諦邊未能證一切滅盡，而於當滅位證滅已周。道則不然，種姓多故，異種姓道不能修故。於自根姓雖容得、修，百千分中不起一故。苦現觀邊苦必遍知，故不別釋。 > \[The phrase\] "Conventional cognition was previously \[...\] because the lineages are manifold" presents the answer. Because conventional cognition has repeatedly known, abandoned, and realized among the three truths, it is cultivated at the border of direct realization. As it has never had an actualized direct realization with respect to the path, it is not called cultivation. Because the path is not a single enterprise, at the subsequent cognition of the path one does not cultivate conventional \[cognition\]. Furthermore, there is definitely no exhaustive direct realization of the enterprise with respect to the path. That is to say, with respect to the three truths of suffering, origination, and cessation in the three realms, one can exhaustively know suffering, exhaustively abandon origination, and exhaustively realize cessation; therefore at the border of direct realization one can cultivate conventional cognition. But there is definitely no possibility of exhaustively cultivating the path; therefore at the border of direct realization one does not cultivate conventional cognition. Although at the border of the truth of origination one has not yet abandoned all origination without remainder, at the actual stage of origination the abandonment of origination has already been completed; although at the border of the truth of cessation one has not yet realized all cessation without remainder, at the actual stage of cessation the realization of cessation has already been completed. The path is not so: because the lineages are manifold, one cannot cultivate the paths of different lineages; and even though acquisition and cultivation are admissible within one's own faculties and lineage, one does not arouse even one out of a hundred thousand parts. At the border of the direct realization of suffering, suffering is definitely exhaustively known; hence it is not separately explained. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 26.130](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.26.130) - [Next: 26.132](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.26.132) - [Up: 26](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.26) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821~en-mt.26.131) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (1) - [俱舍論頌疏論本](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1823.26.98) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.26.131](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.26.131) · Pramāṇa