[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821) › 26.47 # 俱舍論記 26.47 俱舍論記 26.47 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [26.47](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.26.47) 「有說經言至應得離貪名」者，此下諸師解他心智經有貪心等。說一切有部有一師說：此經中言有貪心者，於前二種唯說第一貪相應心。離貪心者，謂治貪心，即是有漏、無漏善心，但能對治貪者名離貪心。若異我說有餘師言貪不相應名離貪心者，餘瞋等惑相應者應得離貪名。然不可說名離貪心，以染污故。 > As for the passage from "Some say that the sūtra..." to "...should receive the name 'free from lust'": below, the various masters explain the mind with lust, etc., in the Sūtra on Knowledge of Others' Minds. A master of the Sarvāstivāda says: What this sūtra calls a mind with lust refers, among the previous two types, only to the first, a mind associated with lust. A mind free from lust means a mind that counteracts lust, namely, wholesome minds, both defiled and undefiled; whatever can counteract lust is called a mind free from lust. If, contrary to my explanation, other masters say that being unassociated with lust is called a mind free from lust, then minds associated with other defilements such as anger should also receive the name "free from lust." Yet they cannot be called minds free from lust, because they are defiled. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 26.46](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.26.46) - [Next: 26.48](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.26.48) - [Up: 26](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.26) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821~en-mt.26.47) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.26.47](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.26.47) · Pramāṇa