[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821) › 26.96 # 俱舍論記 26.96 俱舍論記 26.96 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [26.96](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.26.96) 「如是古釋至非我」者，論主言。如是古釋既非一門，故隨所樂。又作後兩解，此即第三番釋。體生滅故非常；有漏之法違聖心故苦；於此蘊中無我故空，如舍中無人；即蘊自體非我故非我，如言即舍非人。 > Regarding the passage from "Such ancient explanations" up to "not-self": The author of the treatise states that since such ancient explanations are not of a single approach, one may follow whatever one prefers. He then presents the latter two explanations; this is the third exposition. It is impermanent because its essence arises and perishes; it is suffering because sāsrava dharmas run contrary to the minds of the noble ones; it is empty because within these skandhas there is no self, just as there is no person within a house; it is not-self because the self-nature of the skandhas itself is not a self, just as one says that the house itself is not a person. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 26.95](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.26.95) - [Next: 26.97](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.26.97) - [Up: 26](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.26) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821~en-mt.26.96) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (1) - [阿毘達磨俱舍論](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.darsana.abhidharma.abhidharmakosa!bhasya*zh-xuanzang.26.24) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.26.96](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.26.96) · Pramāṇa