[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821) › 28.116 # 俱舍論記 28.116 俱舍論記 28.116 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [28.116](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.28.116) 「第三染中至所迷亂故」者，此明三定染無念、慧二。行捨理無，同第四簡，故不別說，但有樂、定。故《正理》云「第三染中無正念慧，彼為染樂所迷亂故。染污定中雖有念、慧，而得失念、不正慧名。故此二支染中非有。行捨唯是大善法攝，例同第四，故此不遮。故此染支唯有二種。」 > "In the third defiled \[dhyāna\] \[...\] because it is deluded and confused \[by defiled pleasure\]": this clarifies that the third defiled dhyāna lacks smṛti and prajñā. By reasoning there is no equanimity (upekṣā), which is excluded in the same way as in the fourth and thus not separately mentioned; there are only pleasure and samādhi. Thus the Nyāyānusāra says: "In the third defiled \[dhyāna\] there are no right smṛti and prajñā, because it is deluded and confused by defiled pleasure. Although defiled samādhi has mindfulness and discernment, they receive the names of loss of mindfulness and improper discernment. Therefore these two factors do not exist in defilement. Equanimity (upekṣā) is subsumed solely under great wholesome dharmas; by analogy with the fourth, it is not negated here. Therefore the factors of this defiled \[dhyāna\] are only two." > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 28.115](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.28.115) - [Next: 28.117](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.28.117) - [Up: 28](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.28) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821~en-mt.28.116) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.28.116](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.28.116) · Pramāṇa