[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821) › 28.168 # 俱舍論記 28.168 俱舍論記 28.168 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [28.168](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.28.168) 「根本地攝至必緣下故」者，釋下兩句。根本地攝善無色定，不緣下地諸有漏法，已厭離故、定狹劣故。准義應知，隨其所應，緣下無漏自，及上地有漏、無漏一切諸法無不能緣。雖亦能緣下地無漏，緣類智品道，不緣法智品。故《正理》云「以但能緣自全治故。法非全治，如先已說。又法品道於無色界雖能對治，是客非主，既不能緣下地有漏，亦不能緣下地有漏法上擇滅、非擇滅。」問：既緣下地類智品道，亦緣彼道非擇滅耶？解云：亦緣下地類智品上非擇滅。故《婆沙》第十解非我行相中云「四無色地亦有此行相，而不能緣一切法。謂空無邊處非我行相。緣四無色彼因彼滅一切類智品道，及四無色非擇滅。一切類智品道非擇滅，并一切虛空無為，或欲令是一物、或欲令是多物，此行相盡能緣。如是乃至非想非非想處非我行相。緣非想非非想處彼因彼滅一切類智品道，及非想非非想處非擇滅，一切類智品道非擇滅，并一切虛空無為，或欲令是一物、或欲令是多物，此行相盡能緣。」此當《婆沙》評家義。以此准知，四無色定亦緣下地類智品上非擇滅也。無色近分亦緣下地，彼無間道必緣下故。 > Regarding 'Belonging to the fundamental stages ... must take the lower as object': this explains the lower two lines. Wholesome immaterial absorptions subsumed under the fundamental stages do not take lower contaminated dharmas as object, because they have already been reviled and abandoned, and because the concentration is narrow and inferior. As reasoned, one should know that, according to what is appropriate, there is nothing among lower uncontaminated dharmas, self, and all higher contaminated and uncontaminated dharmas that they cannot take as object. Although they can also take lower uncontaminated dharmas as object, they take the path belonging to category-knowledge as object, not the path belonging to dharma-knowledge. Therefore the \*Nyāyānusāra\* says: 'Because it can only take as object what completely counteracts itself. Dharma\[-knowledge\] is not a complete antidote, as was previously explained. Furthermore, although the path of the category of dharma\[-knowledge\] acts as an antidote for the immaterial realm, it is a guest and not the host; since it cannot take lower contaminated dharmas as object, it also cannot take the analytical cessations or non-analytical cessations of lower contaminated dharmas as object.' Question: Since it takes the path belonging to lower category-knowledge as object, does it also take the non-analytical cessation of that path as object? Explanation: It also takes the non-analytical cessation of the lower path of category-knowledge as object. Thus fascicle 10 of the \*Vibhāṣā\*, explaining the aspect of non-self, says: 'The four immaterial stages also have this aspect, yet they cannot take all dharmas as object. Namely, the aspect of non-self in the stage of boundless space takes as object all paths of category-knowledge of the four immaterial \[realms\] as their causes and their cessations, and the non-analytical cessations of the four immaterial \[realms\], the non-analytical cessations of all paths of category-knowledge, and all unconditioned space; whether one intends these to be one entity or multiple entities, this aspect completely takes them as object. Thus it continues up to: the aspect of non-self in the stage of neither-perception-nor-non-perception takes as object all paths of category-knowledge of the stage of neither-perception-nor-non-perception as its cause and its cessation, and the non-analytical cessation of the stage of neither-perception-nor-non-perception, the non-analytical cessations of all paths of category-knowledge, and all unconditioned space; whether one intends these to be one entity or multiple entities, this aspect completely takes them as object.' This represents the view of the evaluators in the \*Vibhāṣā\*. By analogy with this, one knows that the four immaterial absorptions also take as object the non-analytical cessation of the lower path of category-knowledge. The threshold stages of the immaterial \[realms\] also take lower \[stages\] as object, because their uninterrupted paths must take lower \[stages\] as object. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 28.167](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.28.167) - [Next: 28.169](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.28.169) - [Up: 28](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.28) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821~en-mt.28.168) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (5) - [俱舍論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.28.226) — Classical Chinese - [俱舍論頌疏論本](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1823.28.82) — Classical Chinese - [阿毘達磨順正理論](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.darsana.abhidharma.abhidharmakosa!nyayanusara*zh-xuanzang.78.24) — Classical Chinese - [阿毘達磨俱舍論](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.darsana.abhidharma.abhidharmakosa!bhasya*zh-xuanzang.28.34) — Classical Chinese - [阿毘達磨藏顯宗論](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.darsana.abhidharma.abhidharmakosa!abhidharmakosasastrakarikabhasya*zh-xuanzang.39.16) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.28.168](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.28.168) · Pramāṇa