<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.28.26 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821) › 28.26

# 俱舍論記 28.26

俱舍論記 28.26

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [28.26](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.28.26)

「無太過失至有惡靜慮」者，答。無太過失，要與善靜慮相似義中方名染靜慮，餘非相似不名靜慮。生芽名種、敗種名種，似生種故立以種名。等謂等取涸池、死人等，此即引喻。世尊亦說有惡靜慮，即味靜慮。此即引證。

> As for "There is no fault of being overly broad... there are bad dhyānas": this is the answer. There is no fault of being overly broad: it is only when there is similarity in meaning to wholesome dhyāna that it is called defiled dhyāna, whereas anything else that lacks similarity is not called dhyāna. A seed that sprouts is called a seed, and a ruined seed is also called a seed; because it resembles a viable seed, it is given the name 'seed'. 'And so forth' includes dried ponds, dead men, and the like; this adduces an analogy. The World-Honoured One also spoke of 'bad dhyānas', which refers to relish-associated dhyāna (āsvādanā-dhyāna). This adduces proof.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 28.25](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.28.25)
- [Next: 28.27](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.28.27)
- [Up: 28](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.28)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821~en-mt.28.26) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.28.26](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.28.26) · Pramāṇa
